tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-897393976538678091.post8736810964567268625..comments2007-05-04T10:39:37.293+02:00Comments on Keep It Simple - Make It Simpler: <% cache_unless(params.include?('no_cache_please')...Alain Ravetnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-897393976538678091.post-24379603390351663522007-05-04T10:39:00.000+02:002007-05-04T10:39:00.000+02:00@Jan(I updated the text to clarify the article is ...@Jan<BR/><BR/>(I updated the text to clarify the article is about fragments and actions caching)<BR/><BR/>True, page caching (to HTML static files) is as powerful as it's easy to add in Rails.<BR/>All the Vooruit feeds are actually static files generated that way :<BR/><BR/>class FeedsController < ApplicationController<BR/> # pages are expired by sweepers<BR/> &Alain Ravethttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03094453265524961714noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-897393976538678091.post-80694482713472544282007-05-04T08:58:00.000+02:002007-05-04T08:58:00.000+02:00Caching has proven much more effective to me when ...Caching has proven much more effective to me when making my rails app cache to HTML pages which get server by my lighttpd, so it doesn't have to pass any Rails. In that case it does go fasterJanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16130337411869750164noreply@blogger.com